García De Soto, B; Turk, Ž; MacIel, A; Mantha, B; Georgescu, A and Sonkor, M S (2022) Understanding the significance of cybersecurity in the construction industry: Survey findings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(9): 04022095, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Analogous to Industry 4.0, we have the advent of Construction 4.0, a transformative process wherein digital technology and digitalization affect every phase of the life cycle of construction projects, from the design and contracting phase to the construction, operation, maintenance, upgrade, and decommissioning ones. The progress of digitalization has been uneven, as has been the recognition of the new security environment in which the architecture, engineering, construction, and operation (AECO) industry operates. Hackers for profit, disloyal competitors, disgruntled insiders, or even state agents employing hybrid warfare all utilize cyber means to achieve goals that can disrupt processes, corrupt information, interrupt operations, and cause significant material damage or even loss of human life. Starting from recognizing the paucity of studies in this field, this paper analyzes the results from a survey on cybersecurity awareness in the AECO industry. The analyses employed statistical methods such as t-test, Spearman's rank correlation test, and ANOVA to test the hypotheses formulated to answer the research questions of the study. The resulting data are commented upon and placed in the context of an evolving industry confronted with the shock of the new security environment, while also moving forward on Construction 4.0 as a creator of added value, new efficiencies, and new capabilities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | awareness; construction 4.0; cybersecurity; survey |
| Index terms: | digitalization, survey, profit, construction project, agent, digital technology, efficiency, industry 4.0, added value, construction 4.0, life cycle, statistical method, decommissioning, construction industry |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, technology adoption, digital technology, value management, computing systems, practitioner, digital engineering, data collection methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, production management, performance management, renovation and retrofit |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here