Intelligent stochastic agent-based model for predicting truck production in construction sites by considering learning effect

Hosseinian, S M; Younesi, S; Razini, S and Carmichael, D G (2022) Intelligent stochastic agent-based model for predicting truck production in construction sites by considering learning effect. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(5): 04022018, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Predicting truck production in construction projects is one of the basic tasks within project planning and control. This paper presents an original and novel intelligent stochastic agent-based model to maximize truck production at construction sites by considering the impact of learning. The proposed model was developed to overcome limitations of existing models, including a lack of the inclusion of a training mechanism and a reward/penalty framework for truck performance. Ideas of reinforcement learning theory were used. A reward/penalty function was designed based on minimum travel time. Traffic and fuel volume were treated as stochastic variables. A worked example and a real case study are presented to show the applicability and efficiency of the proposed model. The paper shows that the results of the proposed model accurately predict truck production. The paper also shows that the proposed model demonstrates a shorter truck travel time and, thus, higher production compared to the Monte Carlo simulation logic. The method proposed here offers an original contribution to the analysis of truck production and will be of use to practitioners engaged in project planning and control, especially in large earth-moving operations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agent-based stochastic modeling; construction sites; learning; truck production
Index terms: reinforcement, modelling, efficiency, case study, Monte Carlo simulation, construction project, learning theory, practitioner, agent, project planning, penalty, construction site
Subjects: regulatory law, production management, performance management, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, work location, building materials, control systems, practitioner, learning theory, data collection methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here