Jia, F; Xiang, P and Chen, D (2022) Prioritizing the operation and maintenance complexity of mega transportation projects based on systems thinking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(2): 0002220, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Complexity creates both challenges and opportunities for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of mega transportation projects (MTPs), making it imperative to explore the O&M complexity. Traditional approaches to the analysis of project complexity followed reductionist thinking and failed to address the relationships between system elements. Therefore, this study proposes a systems thinking-based framework that captures the relationships to prioritize the O&M complexity of MTPs using social network analysis (SNA). First, 47 complexity indicators were identified through a literature review, semistructured interviews, and a Delphi survey. These indicators were applied to map the O&M complexity network of the Chengdu-Chongqing Highway, with the structural characteristics analyzed using SNA. The results reveal that the availability of technologies, skills, methods, and tools is most closely related to other indicators and that the sharing level of operational information most strongly controls other indicators. Furthermore, the management strategies for this case were formulated according to the centrality of network nodes, and a complexity management process that can be applied to prioritize and manage the O&M complexity of any MTP was designed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity prioritization and management; mega transportation projects; operation and maintenance complexity; social network analysis; systems thinking |
| Index terms: | interview, management strategy, prioritizing, project complexity, systems thinking, transportation project, social network analysis, complexity, Delphi survey, literature review, operation and maintenance |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational theory, maintenance engineering, research methods, decision analysis, data collection methods, management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here