Kurwi, S; Demian, P; Hassan, T M and Blay, K B (2022) A process model for collaboration at the design stage of rail project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(10): 04022105, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The absence of a clear collaboration process at the design stage of rail projects hinders the ability to provide the right information at the right time for the right purposes. The scope and complexity of rail projects make them particularly sensitive to problems arising from poor collaboration. Within projects, collaboration is a key enabler for effective decision-making and rework reduction, and this leads to time and cost savings. Strategies and technologies such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information System (GIS) facilitate collaboration among project stakeholders during the asset delivery phase, but require a roadmap to ensure successful implementation. Using collaboration as a theoretical lens, and applying collaboration technologies, this paper conceptualized the collaboration processes for rail delivery with the focus on the design stage. The aim of this research was to develop a collaboration process model at the design stage of rail delivery. Ten in-depth interviews with BIM, GIS, and rail delivery experts were carried out to identify the dimensions and characteristics of the collaboration process model. The collaboration process emerging from the results was modeled using Integrated Definition (IDEF) notation, and revealed the project activities, key players' roles, and responsibilities for effective BIM-GIS-based collaboration in the design stage of rail projects. The process was operationalized by customizing a commercial common data environment platform and was validated using a focus group and an in-depth interview to establish the trustworthiness of the theoretically modeled collaboration process for rail delivery. The precise model of the collaboration process, based on integrated use of BIM and GIS, constitutes a significant original contribution of this research. This model should facilitate smoother implementation of these technologies, timely information flows between project participants, and ultimately more-effective delivery of rail projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; collaboration; geographic information system; integrated definition; process model; rail |
| Index terms: | platform, building information modelling, geographic information system, cost saving, dimension, implementation, information flow, rework, strategy, focus group, interview, customizing, railway construction, complexity, design stage, common data environment, project stakeholder, collaboration, decision-making |
| Subjects: | professional practice, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, construction manufacturing, operations management, computing systems, data collection methods, information systems, systems engineering, geographical techniques and analysis, sociology, decision analysis, digital design, management, economics, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here