Application of takt and kanban to modular wind turbine construction

Lerche, J; Enevoldsen, P and Seppänen, O (2022) Application of takt and kanban to modular wind turbine construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(2), ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This study focuses on the applicability of Takt planning in combination with Kanban, plan-do-check-act (PDCA)/Deming cycle, and visual management to modular offshore wind turbine construction. The modular offshore wind industry, and in particular an offshore wind project in the British section of the North Sea, faced issues with delivery times, productivity, and uncertainty management (safety and/or pandemic disruptions). The objective of our research was to develop and test a conceptual model that responds to these challenges, which further will increase the likelihood of reducing delays in offshore energy operations. The initial literature review made it evident that few, if any, have covered Takt implementation in modular construction, and certainly not in offshore energy operations. A design science approach was chosen, and in collaboration with the case organization, the model was constructed and evaluated in a longitudinal field study. The application of mixed methods ensured data input originating from practical experience provided by field experts both within and outside the case-study organizations, theoretical knowledge from academics, and state-of-the-art literature allowed the development of a model that embeds Kanban, Takt, and PDCA to the context of modular offshore wind turbine tower construction. After its implementation, a 10% increase in labor productivity was recorded. Furthermore, through the stable productivity measures in a time of crisis, the model revealed its robustness during COVID-19. The contributions to the body of knowledge are the developed model combining Takt, Kanban, and PDCA, and the visual management interface. The model was implemented together with the visual management interface to achieve a flexible planning framework that can respond to challenges with delivery times and productivity and withstand major disruptions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19; design science; disruptions; management; modular construction; safety
Index terms: delivery time, labour productivity, uncertainty management, implementation, pandemic, visual management, mixed method, productivity, modular construction, collaboration, state of the art, body of knowledge, COVID-19, field study, science, literature review
Subjects: knowledge management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, specialized education, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, risk assessment, time analysis, building construction, management, health risk and incident analysis, research methods
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Education, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here