Li, Y; Wang, J; Cao, L; Wei, D and Wang, Y (2022) Three-step mathematical model for optimizing rebar cutting-stock with practical application. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(7): 04022043, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Theory of operations research is applied in this paper. The minimum total cost of steel reinforcement work was used as the objective function, and a three-step mathematical model to optimize the rebar cutting-stock was developed for building the finished rebars. Model I was applied to determine the whole raw material rebars that build the finished rebar. Models II and III were then applied to obtain the cut rebars needed to form the remaining rebar length of the finished rebar. The optimization results of the three-step model were combined to obtain a rebar cutting-stock list and method. Note the following results: (1) Considering comprehensively the effects of labor and material costs in the models led to the least rebar waste and number of welding spots, and thus the minimum total cost was reached. (2) In Model I, the minimum of cost sum of the rebar waste and welding spot count was taken as the objective to use the longer whole rebars first to minimize cutting and welding operations, and reducing the remaining rebar count reduced the subsequent calculation workload of Models II and III. (3) In model II, a constraint that every rebar section length be restricted to three nonoverlapping cases was imposed, which ensured that welding spots were not located in the midspan of a finished rebar. (4) In the practical case study considered, the rebar waste rate was 0.44%, and the finished rebars including 1 or 2 welding spots accounted for 90% of all finished rebars, which shows that the overall number of welding spots was small. The optimization not only clearly saved the rebar material cost but also decreased the labor cost of cutting and welding.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | operations research, workload, mathematical model, rebar, reinforcement, labour cost, case study |
| Subjects: | cost management, management, building materials, design methods, data collection methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Procurement, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here