Lingard, H; Zhang, R P; Labond, C; Clarke, J and Doan, T (2022) Situated learning: How interactions with supervisors shape construction apprentices' safety learning and practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(10): 04022107, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the first stage of a research project focused upon supervisor-apprentice communication in the construction industry and the influence that this communication has on apprentices' health, safety, and wellbeing. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 apprentices and 11 supervisors in the Australian construction industry. Interviews explored the quality and nature of supervisor-apprentice communication. The data was analyzed using an inductive and iterative process of reading, coding, and reflection. The results show that apprentice-supervisor interactions play an important role in what is learned and, ultimately, how safety is enacted. Previous research has identified the frequency and quantity of supervisor communication as important for safety in the construction industry. However, The findings of the present study extend this work to provide qualitative insights into the role played by supervisors' safety-related communication in determining: (1) what is learned about safety and risk by inexperienced workers during their on-the-job training; and (2) how work is performed in ways that reflect varying degrees of risk acceptance among apprentices. The qualitative data provide rich and nuanced information regarding the dynamic interactions that take place between apprentices and supervisors within the material environment of the construction site. The results suggest that providing classroom-based safety training to apprentices may be insufficient to ensure safety learning in practice. Rather, effective safety learning programs for apprentices need to consider the social context of the workplace and ensure that supervisor-apprentice communication is supportive of positive safety learning outcomes and behaviors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | reflection, supervisor, safety training, interaction, construction industry, learning outcome, interview, construction site, program, well-being, classroom |
| Subjects: | software systems, professional development, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, student development, behavioral psychology, construction type, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, practitioner, work location |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Education, Site Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here