Greenhouse gas emissions management in prefabrication and modular construction based on earned value management

Liu, G; Huang, R; Li, K; Shrestha, A and Fu, X (2022) Greenhouse gas emissions management in prefabrication and modular construction based on earned value management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6): 04022034, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Prefabrication and modular construction is promoted globally as a sustainable and efficient construction method. The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from prefabricated and modular construction have been widely studied and the focus has mainly remained on the measurement of GHG emissions. There has been limited emphasis on the activity-level emission data analysis, and current methods lack a dynamic approach in the analysis of GHG emissions. These limitations contribute to the lack of GHG emissions evaluation and optimization strategies in prefabrication and modular construction projects. To address this knowledge gap, an earned green value management (EGVM) model based on the earned value management theory is developed for setting up a benchmark for evaluating the GHG emissions. Additionally, a two-phase GHG emissions optimization method based on the EGVM model is proposed. This EGVM model and the GHG emission optimization method were applied in a real prefabricated building project. The results demonstrate that this new approach can facilitate GHG emissions management and can improve decision-making in prefabrication and modular construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: earned value management; greenhouse gas emissions; prefabrication and modular construction
Index terms: data analysis, construction method, earned value management, strategy, decision-making, modular construction, greenhouse gas emission, greenhouse gas, value management, prefabrication, prefabricated building
Subjects: control systems, climate science, data analysis and analytics, management, decision analysis, building construction, environmental health
Topics: Site Management, Value Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here