Bridge deterioration knowledge ontology for supporting bridge document analytics

Liu, K and El-Gohary, N (2022) Bridge deterioration knowledge ontology for supporting bridge document analytics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6): 04022030, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Bridge owners possess important data sources, such as bridge construction records and inspection and maintenance reports, which hold great promise for improving understanding of bridge deterioration and informing maintenance decision making. However, the valuable data buried in these documents are not being fully exploited due to their unstructured nature. Domain-specific semantics are needed to facilitate analysis of the data based on content and domain-specific meaning and to bridge terminology gaps across different sources. To address this need, this paper proposes a bridge ontology (BridgeOnto) that captures deterioration knowledge and semantics related to bridge elements, deficiencies, deficiency causes, and maintenance actions. The proposed ontology was evaluated through answering competency questions, automated consistency and redundancy checking, expert interviews, and application-oriented validation. The BridgeOnto was implemented in supporting automated extraction of information describing bridge conditions and maintenance actions from bridge inspection reports. The experimental results show that the ontology was able to improve information extraction precision, recall, and F-1 measure by 11.7%, 12.4%, and 12.0%, on average. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by offering an ontology that can capture the key deterioration knowledge areas with sufficient coverage and in-depth classification for achieving adequate support for bridge document analytics. By allowing better access to and use of crucial textual data, this research has the potential to improve the understanding of bridge deterioration and enhance maintenance decisions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge data analytics; bridge deterioration; information extraction; ontology; semantic modeling
Index terms: bridge construction, body of knowledge, validation, documents, decision-making, ontology, redundancy, meaning, interview, deterioration, modelling, inspection, owner, semantics
Subjects: data collection methods, analytical methods, material degradation and durability, knowledge management, professional development, infrastructure engineering, management, education and knowledge transfer, quality assurance, decision analysis, sociology
Topics: Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Quality Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here