Construction workers' representativeness heuristic in decision making: The impact of demographic factors

Liu, Q; Ye, G; Yang, J; Xiang, Q and Liu, Q (2022) Construction workers' representativeness heuristic in decision making: The impact of demographic factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(4): 04022005, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A representativeness heuristic (RH) refers to a shortcut in decision making, one or two subdimensions of which have been found to impact construction workers' unsafe behaviors prominently. To reduce workers' reliance on representativeness heuristic effectively, two key questions should be clarified: (1) whether all subdimensions of the representativeness heuristic influence workers' decision making, and (2) whether such a heuristic is more or less prevalent in certain groups. However, both issues remain unresolved. To fill in these research gaps, the current study collected data using a questionnaire survey from 194 Chinese workers in eight construction projects. After a series of analyses, the results revealed that (1) all subdimensions of the representativeness heuristic had potential to impact construction workers' decision making; and (2) workers' reliance on the representativeness heuristic had an initial downtrend followed by an uptrend as age and education level increased, whereas seniority and type of work were not related to this heuristic. The research findings are helpful for safety organizations to manage their diverse workforces. Devoting prevention resources to workers of particular age and education background groups is recommended to reduce the representativeness heuristic and improve the safety performance of construction sites further.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biased decisions; construction workers; demographic factors; representativeness heuristic; unsafe behaviors
Index terms: heuristic, demographic factor, construction worker, prevention, unsafe behaviour, construction site, survey, construction project, decision-making, questionnaire, safety performance
Subjects: production management, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, demography, decision analysis, practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, work location
Topics: Site Management, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here