Martínez Fernández, P; Villalba Sanchís, I; Insa Franco, R and Yepes, V (2022) Slab track optimization using metamodels to improve rail construction sustainability. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(7): 04022053, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Railways are an efficient transport mode, but building and maintaining railway tracks has a significant environmental impact in terms of CO2 emissions and use of raw materials. This is particularly true for slab tracks, which require large quantities of concrete. They are also more expensive to build than conventional ballasted tracks, but require less maintenance and have other advantages that make them a good alternative, especially for high-speed lines. To contribute to more sustainable railways, this paper aims to optimize the design of one of the most common slab track typologies: RHEDA 2000. The main objective is to reduce the amount of concrete required to build the slab without compromising its performance and durability. To do so, a model based on finite-element method (FEM) of the track was used, paired with a kriging metamodel to allow analyzing multiple options of slab thickness and concrete strength in a timely manner. By means of kriging, optimal solutions were obtained and then validated through the FEM model to ensure that predefined mechanical and geometrical constraints were met. Starting from an initial setup with a 30-cm slab made of concrete with a characteristic strength of 40 MPa, an optimized solution was reached, consisting of a 24-cm slab made of concrete with a strength of 45 MPa, which yields a cost reduction of 17.5%. This process may be now applied to other slab typologies to obtain more sustainable designs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | finite-element method; kriging; latin hypercube; optimization; slab track |
| Index terms: | CO2 emissions, railway track, thickness, durability, environmental impact, cost reduction, sustainable design, option |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, materials science, design process, economics, material degradation and durability, environmental impact, air quality |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Risk Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here