Moharrami, S; Bayat, A and Abourizk, S (2022) Modeling microtunnel boring machine penetration rate using a mechanistic approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(11): 04022128, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Predicting the productivity of microtunneling construction projects is challenging, due to the complexities of this trenchless excavation method. One of these complexities is estimating the microtunnel boring machine (MTBM) penetration rate due to the complex nature of the interactions between the MTBM and the ground. In the present study, a novel mechanistic approach based on the theory of contact mechanics is proposed to determine the underlying mechanics of the MTBM penetration rate. Using the proposed mechanistic approach, an analytical model of the MTBM penetration rate is developed, and a mechanistic relationship between the MTBM penetration rate and its influential factors, namely soil properties, operational loads, and cutterhead characteristics, is established. The proposed approach is expected to provide substantial mechanistic insight with respect to MTBM penetration rates by (1) modeling penetration rates of MTBMs into soils, (2) identifying the factors that influence penetration rates based on a fundamental theoretical approach, and (3) providing a useful tool for evaluating MTBM penetration rates based on the combined influences of ground properties, operational loads, and cutterhead characteristics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | mechanistic approach; microtunnel boring machine; microtunneling; penetration rate |
| Index terms: | productivity, penetration, interaction, modelling, estimating, complexity, analytical model, excavation, construction project, microtunneling, influential factor |
| Subjects: | production management, theoretical framing, management, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, market analysis, geotechnical engineering, risk assessment, construction operations, analytical methods, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here