Single-side accumulative jacking construction method for large-span arched latticed shells

Shen, Y; Lin, Z and Wang, Z (2022) Single-side accumulative jacking construction method for large-span arched latticed shells. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(12): 06022001, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

For large-span spatial structures, we have been committed to exploring new effective construction methods to avoid the drawbacks of traditional construction methods. This study proposes an efficient and cost-effective construction method for large-span arched latticed shell structures. The method relies on a progressive approach working from a rotating hinge at the initial end of the latticed frame. Further segments of the lattice are connected at ground level and progressively jacked into position until the span is complete. Once complete, the span is fixed at the opposite end to the hinge. During assembly stability is provided by cables to manage the dead load thrust. In this study, the application of the new construction method in a large-span structure for coal storage is described in detail, and the structural forces and deformations in various construction steps are analyzed and discussed. Compared with traditional methods, the method requires much less scaffolding and less working at height, which could save about 70% of the construction cost and shorten the construction period by 25%. This study enriches the types of construction methods for large-span arched latticed shells, provides a new option for high-efficiency, low-cost construction of this kind of structure, and also gives a reference for future research on the innovation of construction methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: arched latticed shell; coal storage; construction method; jacking
Index terms: option, construction cost, efficiency, stability, deformation, construction method, traditional construction, scaffolding
Subjects: structural engineering, performance management, financial and cost management, operations management, material properties and characteristics, heritage and conservation, decision analysis, building construction
Topics: Construction Materials, Site Management, Cost Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here