Network perspective in megaproject management: A systematic review

Shi, Q; Chen, X; Xiao, C and Han, Y (2022) Network perspective in megaproject management: A systematic review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(7): 03122002, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Megaproject management has continuously faced new challenges that require new theories and methods. The network perspective has been an increasing trend in this context. However, there is a lack of consensus concerning the applicability of network thinking to megaprojects and the status of network analytic methods with respect to the facilitation of megaproject management. This paper aims to present the full status of the network perspective in the context of megaproject management, integrate network thinking, clarify the application of network analytic methods, and accelerate the network paradigm in the context of megaproject management. This research included a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses framework. A total of 152 relevant studies were retrieved from three major databases and reviewed. The findings of this study were based on a novel integrated framework that included the constitutive and the analytic perspectives of the network paradigm. The constitutive perspective sheds light on the megaproject network, its definition, characteristics pertaining to network thinking, and megaproject governance through network logic. The analytic perspective illuminates the applicability of network methods to megaproject issues in detailed subknowledge areas, including stakeholder management, risk management, communication, coordination and collaboration, knowledge management, and interface management. Furthermore, these two perspectives were generalized and converged into pure categories of network research, including network mechanisms and antecedents, network patterns and dynamics, network functions and outcomes, and network controls and optimization. Based on meticulous discussions concerning the integrated framework, limitations and future directions for progress in this area were proposed to facilitate a deeper exchange of ideas in the context of any future research efforts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: megaproject management; network governance; network perspective; project network; systematic review
Index terms: stakeholder management, dynamics, collaboration, meta-analysis, database, systematic literature review, coordination, interface management, knowledge management, risk management, paradigm, governance, megaproject, project network
Subjects: research evaluation and metrics, management, participation process, education and knowledge transfer, business, data management, risk assessment, systems engineering, professional development, strategic project management, project planning
Topics: Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Governance, Information Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here