Hybrid GA-manfis model for organizational competencies and performance in construction

Tiruneh, G G and Fayek, A R (2022) Hybrid GA-manfis model for organizational competencies and performance in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(4): 04022002, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The majority of competency and performance modeling methods available in the literature are deterministic conceptual, statistical, and/or regression models that cannot capture the subjective uncertainty, complex, and nonlinear relationships inherent in construction, which makes accurate prediction difficult. Past studies utilized neuro-fuzzy system (NFS) models, such as adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), that combine the learning power of artificial neural networks and functionality of fuzzy systems to develop accurate predictive models. ANFIS is robust, fast, and effective in solving complex problems for a range of real-world construction engineering and management (CEM) applications. NFS models such as ANFIS have some limitations in handling multiple outputs common in construction industry problems, such as being prone to early convergence due to local minima entrapment. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a hybrid NFS combining the evolutionary optimization technique of a genetic algorithm (GA) with a multi-output adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (MANFIS) that can handle multi-input multi-output (MIMO) problems for CEM applications. The proposed modeling approach is demonstrated using a case study that showed good results in predicting multiple organizational performance metrics using organizational competencies. The contributions of this paper are threefold: It (1) proposes a novel methodology of integrating different computing techniques for developing a GA-based multi-output adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (GA-MANFIS) model that can handle complex and nonlinear MIMO problems inherent in construction processes and practices; (2) relates organizational competencies to performance and predicts multiple organizational performance metrics; and (3) provides a GA-based feature selection approach that reduces data dimensionality, enabling identification of organizational competencies that significantly influence organizational performance. By uniquely integrating these techniques, this model enables construction organizations to evaluate their competencies and predict multiple organizational performance metrics simultaneously, and researchers can adapt it for a variety of construction contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; hybrid neuro-fuzzy systems; organizational competency; organizational issues; performance
Index terms: genetic algorithm, fuzzy inference, artificial neural network, functionality, computing, methodology, construction process, case study, optimization technique, construction organization, regression model, organizational performance, construction engineering, artificial intelligence, organizational issue, construction industry, modelling
Subjects: computing systems, organization, business, data collection methods, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, design features, algorithms, research methods, engineering methods, performance measurement, statistical analysis, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, building construction
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here