Work density method for takt planning of construction processes with nonrepetitive work

Tommelein, I D (2022) Work density method for takt planning of construction processes with nonrepetitive work. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(12): 04022134, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A new method is presented for construction process planning. It is based on the concept of work density and called the Work Density Method (WDM), two terms coined for use in this context. Using the WDM, planners create one-piece workflow by dividing work space into zones while assigning each zone exclusively for each trade to complete their work, with trades working in consecutive process steps, each one taking up to the same fixed amount of time. The method supports development of a plan (using takt or not) for repetitive as well as nonrepetitive work thanks to work density serving as the common unit to describe workload. The WDM is an iterative method using work structuring to decide a sequence of process steps, zone the work space while lowering the peak of the cumulative work density (i.e., workload peak), determine a lower bound on the takt that can be met, and verify this meets customer requirements. The method was developed experimentally on a live project. This paper rationalizes the use of work density in planning, illustrates the WDM using examples, presents a paradox, and suggests method enhancements. The contribution to knowledge is the formulation of a new planning method that augments existing planning methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: lean construction; location-based scheduling; process planning; space scheduling; takt planning; work density method
Index terms: density, planning method, planner, workload, lean construction, scheduling, workflow, paradox, construction process
Subjects: profession, operations research, urban planning, analytical methods, social theory and frameworks, management, building construction
Topics: Human Resources, Urban Studies, Site Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here