Wang, S; Ni, Z; Qu, T; Wang, H and Pan, Q (2022) A novel index to evaluate the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil for epb shield tunnelling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6): 04022028, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although slump testing has been used extensively to assess the workability of conditioned soil in shield-driven tunnelling, this traditional evaluation method still requires many subjective descriptions. This study developed a novel and objective index to assess the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil. A series of slump tests was performed on gravely sands with different conditioning parameters. The test results suggested that foam conditioning was suitable only for sands (lacking fine grains) with low water contents. Inspired by the observation that appropriately conditioned soils usually form a platform with a certain diameter on the top of slumped specimens, a novel evaluation index is proposed to evaluate the workability of conditioned coarse-grained soil. In contrast to the traditional method of using slump value to assess conditioned coarse-grained soil, a prominent advantage of this method is that it eliminates the need to judge whether water or foam bleeds from slumped specimens, and thus it is easier to implement on construction sites. The results of verifications with theoretical analysis and field applications on a construction site confirmed that this new method is practically effective for evaluating the conditioning state of coarse-grained soil in mechanized tunnelling with earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machines. The proposed F index provides a simple but quantitative evaluation perspective for the workability of conditioned soils, and thus is of significant engineering value.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earth pressure balance shield; evaluation index; muck conditioning; slump test; workability characteristics |
| Index terms: | construction site, platform, sand, testing, workability, tunnelling |
| Subjects: | digital design, civil engineering, building materials, professional practice, design methods, work location |
| Topics: | Site Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here