Wang, X; Arditi, D and Ye, K (2022) Coupling effects of economic, industrial, and geographical factors on collusive bidding decisions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(7): 04022042, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Collusive bidding has been a major concern for both antitrust authorities and clients because it can inflate winning prices to artificially high levels. Deciding to initiate such an illegal business competition is subject to external environmental factors (EEFs). Understanding the EEFs' impacts on collusive bidding decisions allows institutional arrangements to encapsulate free and fair competition. Although previous studies have examined the EEFs separately, few have explored their synthesis in determining collusive bidding decisions. This study decomposed the EEFs into three categories: economic, industrial, and geographical (EIG), and detected their effects on collusive bidding decisions by using 254 collusive bidding cases gathered from the Chinese construction industry. Results of the data analysis indicated that as a key EEF, industrial competition has a positive effect on bidders' collusive willingness and collusive team number. However, its impacts on collusive bid prices are negative. In addition, the coupling of economic development and industrial competition positively affects bidders' collusive prices. These findings provide new insight into the essence of the EEFs and support the formulation of countermeasures to deter bidders from seeking a to-collude decision.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collusion prevention; collusive bidding; collusive decisions; coupling; external environment |
| Index terms: | prevention, construction industry, bidder, coupling, collusive bidding, environmental factor, competition, collusion, data analysis, business competition, economic development |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, industry analysis, market analysis, financial risk, tendering, economics, economic development, bidding, environmental science, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here