Ye, M; Lu, W and Xue, F (2022) Impact of institutional distance on environmental and social practices in host countries: Evidence from international construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1): 04021189, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction businesses expanding internationally often need to devise corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an indispensable component of their competitive strategies. Companies will customize their CSR programs to be in line with host countries' institutional environments. Meanwhile, this customization will be unavoidably influenced by the institutions in their home countries. This research aims to explore whether the institutional distance between home and host countries matters to CSR, in particular, its related environmental and social practices. Data regarding the CSR practices in host countries are extracted from CSR/sustainability reports by using content analysis and text mining. Logistic regression models are then applied to test the roles of institutional distance and host country contexts on the two types of CSR practices. It is found that the institutional distance has no impact on environmental practices in host countries, but the embedded contexts of host countries positively affect the practices. It is also found that the institutional distance is positively correlated with social practices; however, the positive relationship is less pronounced when the host country's development level is higher. The novelty of this research lies in considering both host countries' contexts and the institutional distance. The findings offer companies new insights on how to engage in environmental and social practices and develop CSR strategies in international construction markets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corporate social responsibility; environmental practice; host country context; institutional distance; legitimacy; social practice |
| Index terms: | legitimacy, customization, strategy, content analysis, mining, markets, logistic regression, social practice, program, competitive strategy, corporate social responsibility, international construction, evidence |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, geotechnical engineering, management, construction manufacturing, evaluation and assessment methods, social theory, statistical analysis, economic analysis, sociology, software systems, strategic management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here