Yuan, Z; Fang, Y; Hong, J; Zhang, Q; Zhang, Z and Ni, G (2022) Coupling relationship between capabilities and benefits of lean construction for precast buildings from a multivariable moderation perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(5): 04022011, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The capabilities (e.g., basic capabilities, professional capabilities, and lean consciousness of workers) and benefits (e.g., time, economy, and quality benefits) of lean construction in some precast building projects are insufficiently coordinated due to the moderating effects of multiple variables. Revealing the relationship among these variables, lean construction capabilities, and lean construction benefits is necessary to solve this problem. Hence, this study identified the three variables of construction complexity, management, and policies from the existing literature and proposed seven hypotheses regarding the relationships among them, lean construction capabilities, and lean construction benefits. On the basis of these hypotheses, a theoretical model of the coupling relationship between lean construction capabilities and benefits for precast buildings under multivariable moderation was established. The theoretical model was tested using 206 valid ones of 292 questionnaires and multiple methods, such as principal component, confirmatory factor, and hierarchical regression analyses. The research results showed the existence of a positive coupling relationship between the capabilities and benefits of lean construction, with a path coefficient of 0.71. Moreover, with higher construction complexity and better management and policies, lean construction benefits have a more significant positive impact on lean construction capabilities. Construction companies should create a benign and sustainable ecology that promotes the mutual transformation of lean construction capabilities and benefits, and workers should be encouraged to participate in construction training with higher complexity to improve their lean construction capabilities. Better management practices and policies, such as flat and specialized organizational structures, flexible and standardized management specifications, lean and information technology, training subsidies, prohibition of subcontracting without qualifications, engineering procurement construction (EPC), and integrated project delivery (IPD), are recommended to ensure the improvement of lean construction capabilities and benefits for prefabricated buildings. The aforementioned research results complement previous studies on the one-way influence of the relationship between construction capabilities and benefits from the perspective of coupling and moderating effects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coupling relationship; lean construction benefits; lean construction capabilities; moderation effect; precast buildings |
| Index terms: | construction company, integrated project delivery, specification, organizational structure, lean construction, complexity, information technology, questionnaire, management practice, ecology, transformation, coupling, subcontracting, qualification, subsidy, consciousness, regression analysis, prefabricated building |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, statistical analysis, building construction, sociology, contractual condition, management, educational resources, environmental science, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, human factors and perception, computing systems, data collection methods, business, organization |
| Topics: | Education, Contract Administration, Site Management, Organizational Design, Supply Chain Management, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here