Automatic information extraction from construction quality inspection regulations: A knowledge pattern-based ontological method

Zhong, B; Wu, H; Xiang, R and Guo, J (2022) Automatic information extraction from construction quality inspection regulations: A knowledge pattern-based ontological method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(3): 04021207, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Quality compliance checking is essential to ensure construction quality, the prerequisite for which is information extraction from construction quality inspection regulations (CQIRs). Due to the inclusion of multiple qualitative constraints, complex syntax, semantic structures, and exceptions, extracting constraint information from CQIR automatically is difficult. To address the research gap, a knowledge pattern-based ontological method was developed to extract constraint information automatically from CQIR. The entire study process was guided by design science. To begin, knowledge patterns of three typical types of construction quality constraints were investigated to identify constraint elements and their semantic relationships, namely construction procedure constraints, product quality attribute constraints, and resource selection constraints. Then an ontology model was developed to represent these knowledge patterns by defining concepts and properties based on identified constraint elements and semantic relations. Based on the proposed ontology model, Java Annotation Patterns Engine (JAPE) rules were encoded to extract constraint information from CQIR. Finally, a prototype system was created to validate the proposed method, using text data from five mandatory regulations of groundwork and foundation construction. Experimental results demonstrated the theoretical feasibility of the presented method in automatically extracting constraints from CQIR.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction quality; information extraction; knowledge pattern modelling; ontology; quality compliance checking
Index terms: prototype, construction quality, regulation, ontology, science, modelling, compliance, inspection, product quality
Subjects: modelling and simulation, health safety and environment, political science, quality assurance, education and knowledge transfer, specialized education, analytical methods
Topics: Health and Safety, Education, Quality Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here