Zhong, S and Elzarka, H (2022) A hybrid grey system theory-based subcontractor selection model for high-stakes construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6): 04022037, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Proper selection of subcontractors should consider multiple criteria such as cost, schedule, quality, and effective project management and control capabilities. Several multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models that utilize a weighted score have been developed to help contractors select subcontractors. Although such models are capable of considering multiple evaluation criteria, they may unintentionally cover up some subcontractors' deficiencies that can significantly impact project success. Considering such deficiencies is particularly important for high-stakes construction projects. The paper proposes a hybrid grey entropy relational analysis (GERA) model for subcontractor selection that integrates grey relational analysis (GRA) and the grey entropy model (GEM). The proposed GERA model evaluates subcontractors' performance from two perspectives; proximity degree and equilibrium degree. The proximity degree is used to aggregate a subcontractor's attributes into a comprehensive score, while the equilibrium degree is used to expose subcontractors' deficiencies that should exclude them from selection. A case study is used to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed model. The proposed model can be easily adapted to various decision-making scenarios with similar requirements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | equilibrium degree; grey entropy relational analysis; multitype criteria; proximity degree; subcontractor selection |
| Index terms: | subcontractor selection, project management, entropy, case study, subcontractor, decision-making, project success, construction project, aggregate |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, materials science, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, organization, practitioner, thermal systems, production management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here