Zou, Y; Wu, Y; Guo, B H W; Papadonikolaki, E; Dimyadi, J and Hung, S N (2022) Investigating the New Zealand off-site manufacturing industry's readiness for automated compliance checking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(12): 05022013, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Numerous automated compliance checking (ACC) approaches have been developed over the last half of the twentieth century. However, little is known as to how well the ACC technology has served the off-site manufacturing (OSM) industry from the end users' perspective. This paper aims to measure the New Zealand (NZ) OSM industry's awareness and readiness for ACC and explore a pathway toward wider ACC adoption. It first reports on a survey study in NZ with 44 valid survey responses. It then proposes a high-level roadmap with key actions that can facilitate wider ACC adoption through 16 interviews with international ACC experts and a focus group with nine local OSM stakeholders. The results show that although there is a high demand for automating compliance processes, the OSM industry, especially small and medium enterprises, are not ready to adopt the ACC technology. Suggestions to address this include (1) establish the foundation for broad ACC adoption; (2) boost the development of the ACC technology to expedite its maturity, (3) test the ACC technology under different scenarios and customize it for the NZ context; (4) encourage the government to provide funding and policy support; and (5) promote education and training of both building information modeling (BIM) and ACC to OSM stakeholders. The results can provide software vendors with valuable information about user expectations and requirements to develop ACC products that can better serve NZ OSM projects, and help OSM stakeholders in NZ and countries with similar economic and regulatory structures to understand the technological and nontechnological gaps to better prepare for the ACC technology adoption.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automated compliance checking; building information modeling; off-site manufacturing; technology adoption |
| Index terms: | survey, education and training, interview, New Zealand, compliance, focus group, building information modelling, off-site manufacturing, funding, key action, technology adoption, end user |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, information systems, data collection methods, control systems, manufacturing engineering, innovation and technology management, economic analysis, Geography, stakeholder, professional education |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Education, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here