Al-Bayati, A J; Eiris, R; Hernandez, G O and Al-Bayati, M A (2023) Addressing social inequity in construction safety research: Personal protective equipment focus. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(12): 04023127, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The Hispanic construction workforce's contribution to the construction industry is significant. However, this significant contribution is threatened due to higher injury rates among Hispanic workers. One contributing factor to the higher rates of injuries is that occupational safety and health (OSH) research studies have not been sensitive to their working conditions and unique challenges. Social equity in construction-related research helps identify and address the inequalities and barriers that certain groups of workers (e.g., Hispanic construction workers) may face in terms of accessing adequate training, resources, and support to ensure their safety on the job. This study aims to demonstrate how social inequity in OSH research impacts research findings and recommendations. Accordingly, this study replicates a recent study conducted on personal protective equipment (PPE) noncompliance. The findings suggested several statistically significant and practical differences in perceptions between Mexican and non-Hispanic workers. These differences may lead to an insufficient understanding of PPE noncompliance factors if unaccounted for. It is concluded that inclusive research studies are essential for producing reliable findings and practical recommendations. The results of this study can help scholars create better OSH research designs sensitive to workforce components. This will produce high-quality training materials and strategies to reduce the higher probability of injuries among workforce minorities, particularly Hispanic workers in the United States.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | occupational safety and health, minority, inequality, personal protective equipment, working conditions, construction worker, construction industry, research design, construction safety, injury, United States, strategy, face |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, practitioner, psychology, management, Geography, employment law, sociology, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Ethics, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here