Barros, B A F S and Sotelino, E D (2023) Constructability and sustainability studies in conceptual projects: A BIM-based approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(4): 04023012, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Less polluting and more efficient projects can be developed when considering sustainability and constructability in the initial phases of building design. The building information modeling (BIM) methodology uses 3D graphical modeling and parametrized objects and, thus, provides an environment that can seamlessly assess these factors. An in-depth systematic literature review revealed that when these issues are addressed using BIM, they are not considered within the same framework. To address this gap in knowledge, the present work proposes a BIM-based workflow that involves the different agents in a construction, in order to promote a greater participation of builders and environmental specialists at the initial stages of the design. In addition, a plugin is developed in the Autodesk Revit software, named ECOS, that quantifies the constructability and sustainability of a project and identifies which aspects of the project are deficient within this context. ECOS also provides a cost criterion, as this is also an important aspect when evaluating a project. The proposed workflow and the plugin are tested and validated through a survey in conjunction with interviews of sixteen architectural and engineering professionals. The results show that the proposed process map associated with ECOS form a useful framework to promote greater participation of builders and environmental engineers in the initial stages, and, thus, can promote more sustainable designs with better constructability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; constructability; plugin; process map; sustainability |
| Index terms: | environmental engineer, building information modelling, constructability, sustainable design, systematic literature review, interview, modelling, methodology, builder, workflow, building design, agent, survey |
| Subjects: | architectural design, research evaluation and metrics, research methods, data collection methods, profession, practitioner, management, analytical methods, design process, information systems, construction integration |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here