Elelu, K; Le, T and Le, C (2023) Collision hazard detection for construction worker safety using audio surveillance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 04022159, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The ability to hear auditory safety cues of mobile equipment while wearing hearing protection equipment (HPE) is critical to preventing injuries and deaths in construction. Existing collision hazard detection models using proximity technologies have limited applicability due to the need for an expensive and complex deployment of sensing devices on every piece of construction equipment. This study proposes a more affordable collision prevention technology that uses audio signals to detect the presence of mobile equipment. The study addresses the problem by improving the auditory situational awareness for construction workers exposed to loud noises with a novel sound detection model that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to detect the sound of collision hazards buried in a great deal of ambient noises. This study included three phases: (1) collecting audio data of construction equipment, (2) developing a novel audio-based machine learning model for automated detection of collision hazards, and (3) conducting field experiments to investigate the system's efficiency and latency. The outcomes showed that the proposed model detects equipment correctly and can timely notify the workers of hazardous situations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | autonomous sound surveillance; collision hazards; construction safety; hazard detection; machine learning; proximity detection |
| Index terms: | prevention, construction safety, surveillance, construction worker, artificial intelligence, machine learning, presence, experiment, efficiency, injury, construction equipment |
| Subjects: | construction equipment, data collection methods, performance management, practitioner, financial risk, environmental science, monitoring and control systems, environmental health, health conditions and diseases, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Cost Management, Governance, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Sustainability, Plant and Equipment |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here