Hong, Y; Xie, H; Agapaki, E and Brilakis, I (2023) Graph-based automated construction scheduling without the use of BIM. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(2): 05022020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry has been suffering from delays and cost overruns for decades. Experienced schedulers programs and allocate contingencies (both cost and time) based on professional experiences and gained knowledge. Such tacit knowledge has not been captured, stored, and shared with inexperienced schedulers. This paper proposes a graph-based automated scheduling (GAS) method to capture, store, and reuse the tacit knowledge in the construction schedules. The proposed GAS method takes construction schedules as input, extracts schedule features, classifies schedules into different types of sequences, selects and assembles sequences into schedules, and eventually optimizes time- and cost-efficiency of assembled schedules. The GAS method was validated on two case studies. The results indicated that the automatically generated construction schedule is, on average, 6.70% closer to the actual schedule than the planned schedule. Different from existing automatic scheduling methods, GAS relies little on the availability and data richness of building information modeling (BIM) models. Hence, GAS helps schedulers initiate new schedules more efficiently at the early construction stages.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automatic scheduling; case study; project planning |
| Index terms: | scheduler, scheduling, tacit knowledge, project planning, program, cost overrun, automated construction, building information modelling, efficiency, case study, construction industry, construction stages |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, automation and robotics, professional development, software systems, performance management, financial and cost management, project delivery, operations research, control systems, practitioner, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Time Control, Cost Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here