Hu, F; Liao, R and Chen, J (2023) Calculation methods to optimize the number of pedestals and evaluate production plans for precast yards fabricating prestressed bridge beams and precast segments for poststressed segmental erection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 04022146, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Currently, the published methods used to optimize the number of beam pedestals in a precasting yard for bridge beams or segments do not consider all relevant constraints. Therefore, an optimal calculation method based on multiobjective constraints is proposed. The constraints used are the demand plan for erecting beams, the minimum beam storage time, and the actual beam storage time. Two cases were considered based on the relationship between the minimum and actual storage times. When the minimum storage time of the finished beams was equal to the actual storage time, the minimum number of pedestals could be determined through the stage of maximum demand. When the actual storage time of the finished beams exceeded the minimum storage time, multiobjective constraint equations for the production and demand plans of each stage were established, and a logic algorithm is proposed to calculate the minimum number of pedestals. In addition, to identify the appropriate production plan, an optimization method is proposed based on three evaluation indexes: vacancy rate, dispersion, and core area. Taking one project as an example, the minimum number of platforms and optimized production plans were obtained using the proposed method. A complete set of planning processes, including calculation analysis and scheme comparison, is presented in this paper. The results demonstrate that the proposed methods are applicable and can provide a theoretical reference for the optimization of precast yards for bridge construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | calculation method of the number of beam pedestals; evaluation method; multiobjective constraints; production planning schemes; quantitative evaluation indexes |
| Index terms: | beam, bridge construction, platform, vacancy, planning process, production planning |
| Subjects: | project controls, project delivery, real estate economics, digital design, infrastructure engineering, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Time Control, Urban Studies, Project Management, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here