Khalef, R and El-Adaway, I H (2023) Identifying design-build decision-making factors and providing future research guidelines: Social network and association rule analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 04022151, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There is a dire need to rebuild existing infrastructure with strategic and efficient methods. Design-build (DB) becomes a potential solution that provides fast-tracked delivery as a more time and cost-efficient project delivery method. Past research studied factors influencing DB but without providing a holistic analytic approach. This paper fills this knowledge gap. First, a systematic literature review is performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses techniques, and a set of factors affecting DB projects are then identified and clustered, using k-means clustering, based on the whole literature discussions. Second, a graph theory approach, social network analysis (SNA), is conducted methodically to detect the understudied factors. Third, the clustered factors are analyzed using association rule (AR) analysis to identify factors that have not been cross-examined together. To this end, the findings of this research highlighted the need to investigate a group of important understudied factors that affect DB decision-making and procedures that are related to management, decision-making and executive methods, and stakeholder and team related aspects, among others. Also, while the majority of the existing research focused on theoretical efforts, there is far less work associated with computational/mathematical approaches that develop actual DB frameworks. Accordingly, future research is recommended to tackle this critical need by developing models that can assess DB performance, success, and implementation, among other aspects. Furthermore, since none of the studies evaluated DB while factoring in all 34 identified relevant factors, it is recommended that future research simultaneously incorporates most, if not all, these factors to provide a well-rounded and comprehensive analysis for DB decision-making. In addition, future studies need to tackle broader sectors rather than focusing over and over on the already saturated ones. As such, this study consolidated past literature and critically used it to offer robust support for the advancement of DB knowledge within the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | systematic literature review, construction industry, future study, graph theory, social network analysis, project delivery, executive, implementation, social network, decision-making, clustering, meta-analysis |
| Subjects: | practitioner, research methods, project delivery, sociology, research design and methodology, theoretical framing, contractual arrangements, research evaluation and metrics, decision analysis, industry analysis, data science |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here