Lachance, E; Lehoux, N and Blanchet, P (2023) A simulation model to analyze different automation scenarios in a mixed-assembly manufacturing line: Timber-frame prefabrication industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(10): 04023091, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As prefabrication of timber structures in the construction sector becomes part of the solution to overcome the housing and environmental crisis, the lack of efficiency of this industry needs to be addressed. This inefficiency, characterized by low production capacity, high costs, and large workforce, are in part due to the low adoption of automation and robotic technologies, caused by insufficient knowledge and research measuring the impact of these technologies. This paper aims to measure the efficiency of introducing automation in a prefabrication environment of timber-frame structures, through a decision analysis tool. Four layout types with varying automation levels are explored using simulation modeling, while KPIs are exploited to measure the efficiency of each production environment. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the most performing layout if a new type of wall, requiring fewer tasks, is introduced in the product mix. A design of experiments (DOE) is also performed on the fourth layout, a fixed robotic cell with the highest level of automation, to assess the most influential variables. Results show a positive increase in worker, space, and production efficiency as the level of automation increase. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a decision analysis tool supporting the choice of an optimized layout for the prefabrication of timber-frame walls (TFW). The findings and the decision analysis tool should provide solid grounds for future exploration of automation and practice in the field.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; construction sector; prefabrication; simulation; timber |
| Index terms: | sensitivity analysis, design of experiment, exploration, timber structure, construction sector, body of knowledge, housing, efficiency, decision analysis, frame structure, simulation modelling, automation, prefabrication |
| Subjects: | construction type, analytical methods, knowledge management, environmental resource management, modelling and simulation, sustainability and energy, automation and robotics, performance management, structural engineering, environmental hazards, industry analysis, building construction, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here