Lai, X; Huang, J; Lin, S; Hu, C; Mao, N; Liu, J and Chen, Q (2023) Efficiency scoring for subway tunnel construction based on shield-focused big data and Gaussian broad learning system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(12): 04023132, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
During subway tunnel construction, the consumed time for each ring (unit of construction progress) is highly dependent on objective factors such as geological conditions and shield performances, as well as subjective reasons including workers' proficiency and contractors' management skills. It is nontrivial to score each ring's efficiency from an objective angle, so that workers and contractors can receive fair evaluations. In this paper, a scoring method driven by construction big data is proposed. First, to resolve the high-dimensionality problem, a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) was employed to cluster rings of similar conditions in a probabilistic style so that detailed information can be retained. Second, the standard time to finish one ring was analyzed, so that each ring can be labeled as fail or pass, and our task can be considered as a classification problem. Third, for each cluster, a broad learning system (BLS) was developed as a classifier due to its advantages of fast computation and incremental learning. Finally, the BLS was trained with real tunneling data of 23,822 rings, and then scorecards were developed, where results of validation and statistical tests suggested that our method outperforms conventional ones. Feedback from the subway company and two compared contractors suggested that the proposed method is fair and practical, and it could reveal management problems that were easily overlooked.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | broad learning system; gaussian mixture model; progress evaluation; scorecard; standard time |
| Index terms: | efficiency, big data, statistical test, computation, validation, tunnel construction, scorecard |
| Subjects: | information systems, performance measurement, statistical analysis, civil engineering, professional development, performance management, computational methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here