Risk evaluation of logistics park projects' lifecycle during the COVID-19 pandemic: Failure mode and effects analysis

Liang, R; Xue, Z and Chong, H Y (2023) Risk evaluation of logistics park projects' lifecycle during the COVID-19 pandemic: Failure mode and effects analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 04022153, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Logistics parks served as critical logistics facilities during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Constructing these large-scale projects including their subsequent operations involved unusual risk factors that required comprehensive risk evaluations. Therefore, it is vital to examine the potential risk factors across the entire life cycle of these projects in accordance with the complexity of these large-scale logistics park projects (LLPPs) during the pandemic. This study proposes a new risk analysis model that evaluates a comprehensive list of risk factors based on the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). The hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers (HULZNs) and fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering algorithm are incorporated into the FMEA model to evaluate the risk. The practicability of the model was assessed in a case study. The findings identified and distinguished risk factors based on their levels of influences and priorities in dealing with uncertainties during the decision-making process in LLPPs. The FMEA model's new methodological assessment also contributes to the efficient risk evaluation process through its more reliable and reasonable failure mode risk clustering, particularly for complex group decision-making environments during the pandemic.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: lifecycle, risk analysis, failure mode and effects analysis, life cycle, decision-making, clustering, pandemic, failure mode, complexity, decision-making process, coronavirus, risk factor, case study, COVID-19
Subjects: data science, systems engineering, health conditions and diseases, value management, project delivery, reliability engineering, health risk and incident analysis, data collection methods, decision analysis, environmental hazards
Topics: Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here