Understanding the relationship between asset specificity and governance choices in construction projects: Moderating role of uncertainty

Luo, Y and Chen, Y (2023) Understanding the relationship between asset specificity and governance choices in construction projects: Moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(3): 04022178, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In previous research, it has been debated whether uncertainty moderates the relationship between asset specificity and governance mechanisms. The relationship between the owner and contractor is a typical interorganizational collaborative relationship, with contractual and relational governance as key mechanisms. Based on transaction cost theory and relational exchange theory, this paper establishes a competitive conceptual model of construction project transaction characteristics on contractual and relational governance to test the moderating role of uncertainty in interorganizational relationships. The questionnaire data were analyzed with partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to verify the theoretical hypotheses. This paper finds that there is a significant positive correlation between asset specificity and both contractual governance and relationship governance, with uncertainty as a moderator significantly enhancing the correlation between asset specificity and relational governance. The conclusions of this paper support the predictions of relational exchange theory and transaction cost theory. The findings enhance the understanding of project governance mechanisms and interorganizational collaborative relationships. Faced with high uncertainty, the owner and contractor are advised to adopt relational norms such as trust rather than designing more formal contractual terms to resolve conflicts caused by asset specificity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: asset specificity; contractual governance; relational governance; uncertainty
Index terms: governance, interorganizational, owner, asset specificity, interorganizational relationship, transaction cost, structural equation modelling, construction project, questionnaire, contractual term, norms
Subjects: production management, economic concepts, contract structure, statistical analysis, financial analysis, sociology, data collection methods, business
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here