Project close-out process for HVAC mechanical contractors: Current practices

Magxaka, M; Gajjar, D and Lucas, J (2023) Project close-out process for HVAC mechanical contractors: Current practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 05022016, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Project close-out is one of the critical phases for any construction project. Quality of close-out data, timeliness of completion, and responsiveness to owner expectations affect the overall client-contractor relationships. Delays in the close-out process can also affect project profitability and delay moving resources to the next job. Because most of the construction scope of work is performed by the subcontractors, it is critical for the close-out process to be performed efficiently at the subcontractor level. One of the critical subcontractors that are involved in every construction project is the HVAC mechanical contractors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and document the existing close-out processes that are currently being utilized by the HVAC mechanical contractors in the construction industry. Professionals from 14 different HVAC mechanical contracting companies participated in the semistructured interviews for a multiple case study analysis. The qualitative analysis in the form of constant comparison and thematic coding using transcripts from the interview was used to identify the general structure of the close-out process, various close-out strategies, project control and success measures for project close-out, use of technology, and the critical close-out documents. The key findings of the study include the importance of planning for project close-out in the planning phases of the project, clear understanding of the owner and general contractor expectations, and proactively implementing methods to collect close-out data and documentation as soon as it becomes available instead of delaying until the end of the project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: close-out; mechanical contractor; project management
Index terms: owner, case study, construction industry, project management, project control, profitability, strategy, general contractor, documentation, interview, subcontractor, construction project, qualitative analysis, documents
Subjects: management, production management, project management theory and practice, professional development, sociology, industry analysis, data collection methods, research design and methodology, control systems, practitioner, economic analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here