Mei, X; Zhou, X; Xu, F and Zhang, Z (2023) Human intrusion detection in static hazardous areas at construction sites: Deep learning-based method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1): 04022142, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction sites have complex environments and high accident rates. Human intrusion into static hazardous areas is a significant cause of accidents. Traditional engineering safety management mainly relies on manual methods, such as patrol inspection by safety supervisors, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and it is difficult to achieve a complete safety supervision. In recent years, the emergence of artificial intelligence technology and computer vision has provided a new scheme for intrusion detection. However, existing studies have used a single method for human intrusion judgment in static dangerous areas, without in-depth consideration of the influence of human posture, intrusion direction, and other factors. In this study, a computer vision-based intrusion detection method was developed, mainly aimed at static hazardous areas. The object detection was based on the You Only Look Once (YOLO) V5 module to extract the image feature information. Subsequently, the basic rule of intrusion judgment based on the key points of bounding boxes was formulated, in which the workers' intrusion direction was recognized and postured using two auxiliary detection modules. Finally, the intrusion rule base was constructed as the basis for human intrusion detection, containing rules with different sensitivities for different intrusion states. The case study indicated that the precision and recall rate of the algorithm were 96.05% and 90.05%, respectively. Overall, this method can effectively address the defects of manual supervision in engineering safety management, reducing the probability of accident occurrence and enhancing safety at construction sites.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | deep learning; hazardous areas; intrusion detection; intrusion posture; machine vision; you only look once v5 |
| Index terms: | supervision, case study, construction site, artificial intelligence, machine vision, judgment, module, safety management, emergence, deep learning, computer vision, inspection, supervisor, object detection |
| Subjects: | practitioner, control systems, artificial intelligence, systems engineering, dispute resolution, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, architectural elements, computer vision, work location, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Site Management, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here