Montalbán-Domingo, L; Torres-Machi, C; Sanz-Benlloch, A; Pellicer, E and Molenaar, K R (2023) Green public procurement in civil infrastructure construction: Current performance and main project characteristics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(9): 04023089, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Green Public Procurement (GPP) is an alternative for public agencies to purchase goods and services with a reduced environmental impact. GPP encourages the integration of environmental criteria in the procurement procedure to achieve goals related to climate change, resource use, and sustainable consumption and production. The inclusion of environmental criteria in public procurement of civil infrastructure has been claimed as an essential step to enhance sustainability in construction. However, there is limited knowledge of how environmental criteria currently are included in public procurement. This study analyzed the inclusion of environmental criteria in public works procurement. Three research objectives were established: (1) identify the environmental criteria included in public-works procurement of civil engineering projects, (2) analyze how these criteria are included in the procurement processes, and (3) identify the characteristics of projects main factors driving in the inclusion of these environmental criteria. This study analyzed 343 tendering documents from 11 different countries at the international level. Tendering documents were analyzed using quantitative content analysis, descriptive statistics, nonparametric techniques, and logistic regressions. Within the 343 tenders analyzed, the study identified 4,500 instances in which environmental indicators were included in the procurement processes. These instances can be classified into 9 criteria (emissions, energy, environmental management, flora and fauna preservation, landscaping, materials, noise and vibration, waste, and water) and 22 subcriteria. These criteria were analyzed considering their inclusion within the procurement process, in general, and in the different stages of the procurement process, in particular: selection criteria, award criteria, and technical specifications and contract performance clauses. The results show that although more than 90% of the analyzed tenders included environmental criteria, the environmental management criterion was the only one included as selection criteria and award criteria. Environmental criteria tend to be included as technical specifications and contract performance clauses. Their inclusion depends on the type of civil infrastructure, the size of the contract, and the type of construction work. Nevertheless, the project delivery and procurement methods do not influence the inclusion of environmental criteria. This study helps procurement professionals and researchers implement GPP by providing guidance on how to incorporate environmental criteria in the procurement process based on the type of infrastructure and characteristics of the project. This action is necessary for governments interested in improving their performance toward the Sustainable Development Goals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | civil engineering; environmental; green public procurement; public-works procurement; sustainability |
| Index terms: | statistics, selection criteria, environmental management, project delivery, public work, construction work, sustainable development goal, procurement method, logistic regression, infrastructure construction, consumption, agency, climate change, vibration, integration, environmental impact, documents, content analysis, specification, procurement process |
| Subjects: | mechanical systems, mathematical modelling, consumer economics, environmental impact, climate science, operations management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, sustainability assessment, tendering, civil engineering, contractual condition, sustainable design, infrastructure engineering, professional development, organizational analysis, sociology, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here