A data-driven recommendation system for construction safety risk assessment

Mostofi, F and Toǧan, V (2023) A data-driven recommendation system for construction safety risk assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(12): 04023139, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Subjectivity and uncertainty of risk assessment (RA) procedures can be improved by replacing guesswork with data-driven approaches such as machine learning (ML). Although a plethora of ML prediction techniques have been introduced to improve the reliability of RA procedures, the utilization of ML-based recommendation systems that can leverage data from multiple aspects has remained unexplored. In this study, a novel RA recommendation system (RARS) was developed to achieve more reliable, objective, and inclusive safety decisions that can prioritize hazard items and formulate related risky scenarios. To this end, a semisupervised graph representation learning framework, node2vec, was utilized to receive semantic and dependency information from safety records to recommend the components of potential accident scenarios (hazards, hazardous cases, dangerous activities, and risky behaviors) based on the given decision objective. The RARS's ability to provide flexible and user-oriented safety recommendations was explored on a real-life construction accident data set. This allows construction safety practitioners to dynamically evaluate possible risky scenarios with details regarding different influential risk factors and accordingly devise more reliable site safety strategies and relevant policies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety management; data-driven decision-making; graph representation learning; node2vec; recommendation system; risk assessment
Index terms: risk assessment, construction safety, data-driven decision-making, machine learning, practitioner, strategy, construction accident, risk factor, subjectivity
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, artificial intelligence, environmental health, human factors and perception, practitioner, decision analysis, environmental hazards, management, financial risk
Topics: Cost Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here