Environmental impact and cost assessment for reusing waste during end-of-life activities on building projects

Saeed, F; Mostafa, K; Rauch, C and Hegazy, T (2023) Environmental impact and cost assessment for reusing waste during end-of-life activities on building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(10): 04023099, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry contributes significantly to global environmental loads with massive amounts of construction and demolition waste (CDW) ending up in landfills. To address the need for efficient CDW management, this research proposes a new decision support framework for managing construction waste generated during end-of-life activities for building projects. The framework monetizes potential environmental savings from different recovery options (e.g., reuse, recycle, and so on) and uses multiobjective optimization to determine the optimal quantity of material to undergo each material recovery scenario. The framework uses parametric weights to consider stakeholders' preferences and their appreciation of environmental benefits compared with costs. A case study of a renovation project in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, is used to demonstrate how the proposed framework can divert concrete and glass waste from the landfill. For this particular project, savings of 200 GJ of embodied energy, 22 m3 of water, and over 12 t of greenhouse gases can be realized from optimal recovery planning using the proposed framework. This study concludes that decision support systems should be used well in advance of end-of-life activities to evaluate trade-offs for recovery planning activities effectively.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: circular economy; construction and demolition waste; decision support system; life-cycle assessment; multiobjective optimization
Index terms: Canada, savings, circular economy, material recovery, case study, recovery, construction waste, embodied energy, option, construction industry, renovation, construction and demolition, decision support, recycle, landfill, greenhouse gas, preference, environmental impact
Subjects: sustainable design, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, renovation and retrofit, industry analysis, decision analysis, climate science, waste management, environmental impact, data collection methods, economic analysis, energy systems, operations management
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here