Sepasgozar, S M E (2023) Construction digital technology assimilation and absorption capability using measurement invariance of composite modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(7): 04023041, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Digital technology is evolving, and construction companies now have various choices of these technologies to implement into daily business. This has, however, resulted in a growing argument on how digital technologies can be accepted in various contexts. However, most arguments are based on technology acceptance models with the core concept of individual behaviors, which ignores the influence of other stakeholders and organizational characteristics. This paper aims to present a novel model representing the successful practice of the assimilation process for digital construction technologies that should be considered before any technology acceptance analysis. The model was tested via empirical investigation with 372 practitioners from Australia involved in building and infrastructure construction projects. Structural equation modeling, measurement invariance of composite models, and some semistructured interviews were used to test and verify the relationships between key variables of the model. The results suggest that the capability of assimilation can be enhanced by improving innovativeness and the relevant operational processes, with a t-value of >6.27. The findings show that a project's likelihood of successful technology assimilation can also be increased if vendors are supportive and the company improves its operating performance assessment and absorption capacity. The findings clarify theoretical and practical contributions for a better understanding of critical factors of assimilation and provide a tool to potential company users for predicting the success of technology assimilation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | digital technologies; heavy equipment; measurement invariance of composite models; technology assimilation |
| Index terms: | interview, structural equation modelling, construction company, practitioner, infrastructure construction, digital technology, technology acceptance, digital construction, composite, Australia, critical factor, investigation, modelling, organizational characteristic, performance assessment, technology acceptance model |
| Subjects: | practitioner, computing systems, materials science, organization, data collection methods, risk assessment, analytical methods, innovation and technology management, acoustic properties, Geography, civil engineering, information systems, statistical analysis, assessment methods, sociology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here