Functionality as a key concept for integrated project planning and scheduling methods

Sheikhkhoshkar, M; Bril El-Haouzi, H; Aubry, A and Hamzeh, F (2023) Functionality as a key concept for integrated project planning and scheduling methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(7): 04023053, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry has made significant efforts to address the issues of low productivity caused by inefficient construction planning and scheduling. This issue led to more focus on integrating scheduling methods in existing studies without comprehensively analyzing the integration's goals and objectives. In this regard, this study aims to present and analyze a holistic list of integrated scheduling methods' functionalities in the construction sector. In this paper, the underlying concept and main objective of scheduling methods are considered as their functionality. A multistep methodology is adopted for this research. First, the authors identified integrated scheduling methods and their functionalities. Second, social network analysis (SNA) and Pareto analysis were used to assess and analyze the significance of the identified functionalities. The findings indicated that improving planning reliability, increasing transparency, identifying and eliminating wastes, and considering the continuous flow of work that follows the lean principles are the most important employed functionalities in the integrated scheduling methods. Also, the last planner system, building information modeling, simulation methods, and location-based management systems are mainly used common scheduling methods in the integrated scheduling methods. Ultimately, this study will aid project stakeholders in better understanding of integrated scheduling methods by defining the functionality concept of scheduling methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: common scheduling methods; functionality concept; integrated scheduling methods; pareto chart analysis; social network analysis
Index terms: project stakeholder, integration, methodology, last planner system, project planning, construction sector, scheduling, functionality, social network analysis, transparency, construction planning, construction industry, pareto analysis, building information modelling, location-based management system, productivity
Subjects: management, research methods, professional development, project controls, organizational analysis, sociology, industry analysis, information systems, control systems, quality control, operations research, design features, construction planning
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here