Tang, G; Zhao, Z; Cao, L; Qi, Y; Yu, X and Liu, W (2023) A simulation optimization approach to optimize dredger fleet schedule plan for dredging works in existing ports. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(2): 4022165, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Making an optimal dredger fleet scheduling (DFS) plan is difficult for dredging works in existing ports, where the dredging activities are interrupted by stochastic vessel traffic. Therefore, a simulation optimization (SO) approach is adopted to solve the DFS problem. In the SO approach, an agent-based simulation model is first developed to simulate the stochastic traffic flow and possible spatiotemporal traffic conflicts between vessels and dredgers. Then, this simulation model is integrated with an optimization model to find the optimal DFS plan with the objective of minimum total dredging equipment usage fees. Finally, the proposed SO approach is applied to a 4-dredging-job dredging work. The results demonstrate its applicability in identifying the bottlenecks of the DFS plan and finding the optimal DFS plan. This research contributes to gaining more insights into using the SO approach to provide decision making for dredging work planning under uncertainty.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dredger fleet scheduling; simulation optimization; traffic flow; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | dredging, traffic flow, agent, scheduling, decision-making |
| Subjects: | practitioner, decision analysis, water management, transportation engineering, operations research |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here