Tatari, A (2023) Simulating cost risks for prefabricated construction in developing countries using Bayesian networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(6): 04023037, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Prefabricated construction has been widely recognized as a primary method for sustainable construction, improving workflow continuity, increasing resource consumption efficiencies, and minimizing construction waste. While the benefits have been explored, its adoption constraints remain unexplored. Very few studies investigated the complex interrelationships between cost risk factors. The literature lacks a methodology that does not fall short of considering these interrelationships. Due to various interactive constraints, the development of prefabricated construction remains in its infancy. Therefore, the study aims to conduct cost risk identification and assessment methodology to investigate the interrelationships among barriers. In achieving this endeavor, a literature review was conducted first, followed by questionnaire surveys. Lastly, a risk assessment tool was developed by leveraging simulation models of Bayesian networks. The results showed that machinery and technology, direct costs, scheduling and planning, safety hazards, and site layout are the top five significant factors in implementing prefabricated construction with an assessment of 0.817, 0.777, 0.711, 0.687, and 0.666, respectively. The attention is increasing on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The Bayesian model shows that the three most influencing risk factors are a lack of machinery and technology, inadequate experience, and modifications to existing policies that directly influence at least three factors. The three most influenced risk factors are poor understanding, safety hazards, and scheduling and planning which are directly influenced by at least three factors. The study proposed the following mitigation strategies: (1) apply control measures for critical cost risks, (2) control influencing risks, and lastly (3) monitor highly influenced risks. The uniqueness of the study methodology is that it adopts a simulation model that not only simulates the interrelations of the factors but also updates the model when new evidence is revealed. Hence, when conducting a risk control and risk reassessment, the model will provide a prescriptive analysis to proactively control risks. The research builds upon existing knowledge and bridges a gap by investigating cost risks and their interrelationships. Study findings are informative to policymakers, providing a better grasp on prefabricated construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; Bayesian networks; conditional gan; construction projects; data analysis; offsite construction; prefabricated construction; risk assessment; risk identification |
| Index terms: | workflow, questionnaire, evidence, mitigation, construction project, methodology, artificial neural network, risk identification, survey, strategy, literature review, data analysis, site layout, sustainable construction, scheduling, developing country, construction waste, resource consumption, dimension, risk factor, risk assessment, bayesian network, direct cost, efficiency |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, probabilistic model, production management, sustainable construction, financial risk, development economics, management, performance management, economics, research methods, data analysis and analytics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, site logistics, operations research, modelling and simulation, environmental resource management, waste management, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, International Construction, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here