Wang, Z; He, Q; Locatelli, G; Wang, G and Li, Y (2023) Exploring environmental collaboration and greenwashing in construction projects: Integrative governance framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(11): 04023109, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Environmental collaboration between organizations involved in construction projects enables the efficiency of environmental management to gain environmental sustainability. Yet, in many projects, this collaboration is gamed promoting contractor greenwashing behavior, thereby diminishing the effectiveness of environmental management. What is unclear are the underpinning mechanisms to concurrently increase environmental collaboration and decrease contractor greenwashing behavior in construction projects. We used an integrated theoretical framework based on social exchange theory and transaction cost economics to evaluate the potential linear, curvilinear, and combined influence of interorganizational trust and formal contracts on environmental collaboration and contractor greenwashing behavior. Drawing evidence from questionnaire surveys, we find that two categories of interorganizational trust yield positive impacts on environmental collaboration and different curvilinear impacts on greenwashing behavior. Two categories of formal contracts exert an inverted U-shaped effect on environmental collaboration and heterogeneous effects on greenwashing behavior. We also find that formal contracts negatively moderate the effects of interorganizational trust on environmental collaboration, and interorganizational trust negatively moderates the impact of formal contracts on greenwashing. We provide novel insights into the interorganizational governance mechanisms regarding greenwashing in construction projects relevant for construction managers concerned with the environmental efficiency-effectiveness.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental collaboration; formal contracts; greenwashing behavior; interorganizational trust; social exchange theory; transaction cost economics |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, environmental management, social exchange theory, interorganizational, governance, efficiency, construction manager, evidence, questionnaire, construction project, collaboration, environmental sustainability, transaction cost, survey, drawing |
| Subjects: | financial analysis, social theory, production management, health safety and environment, sustainability assessment, management, performance management, technical documentation, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, profession, business |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here