Wu, L; Mohamed, E; Jafari, P and Abourizk, S (2023) Machine learning-based Bayesian framework for interval estimate of unsafe-event prediction in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(11): 04023118, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction safety is a critical concern for industry and academia, and numerous models and algorithms have been developed to predict incidents or accidents to facilitate proactive decision-making. However, previous studies have been limited due to the inability to account for uncertainties because predictions are given as a single value (i.e., Yes or No) and the failure to integrate subjective judgment. To address these limitations, this research proposes a machine learning-based Bayesian framework for predicting construction incidents using interval estimates. This framework combines a state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithm with a binary Bayesian inference model to develop an incident predictor that considers a range of project characteristics and conditions. Notably, this framework also is capable of incorporating historical or subjective judgment through prior selection and outputs the unsafe event prediction as an interval of possibilities, thus accounting for various uncertainties. The efficacy of our framework was demonstrated in a real-life case study, showcasing its practical implications for proactive decision-making and risk management in the construction industry and representing a valuable contribution to the field of construction safety.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bayesian inference; construction safety management; credible interval; interval estimate; machine learning |
| Index terms: | judgment, case study, construction incident, risk management, academia, estimate, construction industry, learning algorithm, state of the art, decision-making, construction safety, accounting, machine learning |
| Subjects: | environmental health, industry analysis, decision analysis, educational institutions, algorithms, health risk and incident analysis, financial and cost management, economic analysis, artificial intelligence, dispute resolution, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here