Xiahou, X; Li, Z; Xia, J; Zhou, Z and Li, Q (2023) A feature-level fusion-based multimodal analysis of recognition and classification of awkward working postures in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(12): 04023138, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Developing approaches for recognition and classification of awkward working postures is of great significance for proactive management of safety risks and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in construction. Previous efforts have concentrated on wearable sensors or computer vision-based monitoring. However, certain limitations need to be further investigated. First, wearable sensor-based studies lack reliability due to vulnerability to environmental interferences. Second, conventional computer vision-based recognition demonstrates classification inaccuracy under adverse environmental conditions, such as insufficient illumination and occlusion. To address the above limitations, this study presents an innovative and automated approach for recognizing and classifying awkward working postures. This approach leverages multimodal data collected from various sensors and apparatuses, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of different modalities. A feature-level fusion strategy is employed to train deep learning-based networks, including a multilayer perceptron (MLP), recurrent neural network (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM). Among these networks, the LSTM model achieves optimal performance, with an impressive accuracy of 99.6% and an F1-score of 99.7%. A comparison of metrics between single-modality and multimodal-fused training methods demonstrates that the incorporation of multimodal fusion significantly enhances the classification performance. Furthermore, the study examines the performance of the LSTM network under adverse environmental conditions. The accuracy of the model remains consistently above 90% in such conditions, indicating that the model's generalizability is enhanced through the multimodal fusion strategy. In conclusion, this study mainly contributes to the body of knowledge on proactive prevention for safety and health risks in the construction industry by offering an automated approach with excellent adaptability in adverse conditions. Moreover, this innovative attempt integrating diverse data through multimodal fusion may provide inspiration for future studies to achieve advancements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | awkward working postures; deep learning; multimodal fusion; risk management; wearable sensors |
| Index terms: | multilayer, deep learning, monitoring, wearable sensor, risk management, prevention, construction industry, future study, health risk, computer vision, neural network, strategy, accuracy, vulnerability, adaptability, body of knowledge, environmental conditions |
| Subjects: | computer vision, financial risk, professional development, management, specialized materials and systems, industry analysis, environmental hazards, environmental health, control systems, risk assessment, research design and methodology, user focus, environmental science, knowledge management, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Materials, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here