Spatial memory of BIM and virtual reality: Mental mapping study

Ye, Y; Xia, P; Zhou, T and Du, J (2023) Spatial memory of BIM and virtual reality: Mental mapping study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(7): 04023042, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Acquiring accurate spatial memory is critical to many architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities maintenance (AECFM) tasks. The literature has recognized that spatial memory (i.e., the memory of locations and spatial relationships) quality can be affected primarily by visualization methods, i.e., the formats in which spatial information is visualized and presented. In addition to traditional two-dimensional (2D) drawings, emerging visualization methods, such as building information modeling (BIM)-based models and virtual reality (VR), provide more options to visualize complex spatial information in an immersive and interactive way. Although it is well recognized that new visualization methods can benefit performance in many spatial tasks (i.e., tasks that rely or partially rely on spatial memory), there is a lack of explicit evidence about how they affect spatial memory development. Many studies used spatial task performance and spatial memory quality interchangeably, which actually are distinct. This paper presents findings of a mental mapping method (i.e., hand sketching the memorized locations and spatial relationships) to directly measure a person's spatial memory quality of different building components and layouts. First, a human-subject experiment (n=63) was performed in which participants were instructed to review a building model with varying visualization methods [2D, BIM-based three-dimensional (3D), and VR]. Then participants were required to sketch the memorized building landmarks and layouts as an explicit measure of the spatial memory quality, followed by an inspection task in the real building. The result showed a significant impact of visualization methods on the quality of spatial memory, which was not correlated with the inspection performance. The findings suggest that explicit mental mapping measures instead of final task performance are needed for evaluating spatial memory in AECFM tasks.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: mental mapping; spatial memory; virtual reality; visualization
Index terms: drawing, experiment, visualization, building component, mapping, evidence, inspection, building information modelling, option, virtual reality
Subjects: technical documentation, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, virtual reality, quality assurance, information systems, decision analysis, design practice, architectural elements, spatial and geospatial analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here