Zhai, P; Wang, J and Zhang, L (2023) Extracting worker unsafe behaviors from construction images using image captioning with deep learning-based attention mechanism. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(2): 04022164, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety in the construction industry has always been a focus of attention. Existing methods of detecting unsafe behavior of workers relied primarily on manual detection. Not only did it consume significant time and money, but it also inevitably produced omissions. Currently, automated techniques for detecting unsafe behaviors rely only on the unsafe factors of workers' ontology to judge their behaviors, making it difficult to understand unsafe behaviors in complex scenes. To address the presented problems, this study proposed a method to automatically extract workers' unsafe behaviors by combining information from complex scenes - an image captioning based on an attention mechanism. First, three different sets of image captioning models were constructed using convolutional neural network (CNN), which are widely used in AI. These models could extract key information from complex scenes was constructed. Then, two datasets dedicated to the construction domain were created for method validation. Finally, three sets of experiments were conducted by combining the datasets and the three different sets of models. The results showed that the method could detect the worker's job type and output the interaction behavior between the worker and the target (unsafe behavior) based on the environmental information in the construction images. We introduced environmental information into the determination of workers' unsafe behaviors for the first time and not only output the worker's job type but also determine the worker's behavior. This allows the model output to be better for ergonomic analysis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction scene; dataset; deep learning; image captioning; unsafe behavior |
| Index terms: | deep learning, construction industry, interaction, neural network, ontology, experiment, unsafe behaviour, dataset, validation |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, industry analysis, data management, financial risk, professional development, education and knowledge transfer, artificial intelligence, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here