Weighing votes in human-machine collaboration for hazard recognition: Inferring a hazard-based perceptual threshold and decision confidence from electroencephalogram wavelets

Zhou, X and Liao, P C (2023) Weighing votes in human-machine collaboration for hazard recognition: Inferring a hazard-based perceptual threshold and decision confidence from electroencephalogram wavelets. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(9): 04023084, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Human-machine collaboration is a promising approach to improve on-site hazard inspection because it can complement the inherent limitations of human cognitive functions. Nevertheless, research on the effective integration of opinions from humans and machines to form optimal group decision-making is lacking. Prior work suggests that a confidence-weighted voting strategy is superior, but self-reported decision confidence is often unreliable. Thus, this study proposes an innovative methodological framework to predict workers' hazard response choices and decision confidence from brain activities captured by a wearable electroencephalogram (EEG) device. First, we developed a Bayesian inference-based algorithm to ascertain the decision threshold above which a hazard is reported characterized by the power of human brain activity. Furthermore, we describe hazard recognition as a process of probabilistic inference involving a decision uncertainty evaluation. Benchmarking against an optimal Bayesian observer, the optimal criteria to differentiate between low-, medium-, and high-confidence levels were obtained based on numerical simulations. The proposed method was tested empirically with a predesigned experiment in which 77 construction workers participated in a hazard recognition task while their EEG data were simultaneously collected. Cross-validating with behavioral indexes of the signal detection theory, the results confirmed the possibility of EEG measurement to observe workers' internal representations when discriminating hazards. Parietal α-band EEG power was chosen as a proxy for confidence-level evaluation prior to responses. Theoretically, this framework characterizes workers' mental model when recognizing hazards. Practically, it enables the prediction of workers' hazard responses and decision uncertainty, supporting the design of future hazard confirmation mechanisms in the collaborative human-machine systems research field.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Bayesian inference; decision confidence; electroencephalogram; hazard recognition; human-machine collaboration; perceptual threshold
Index terms: mental model, experiment, strategy, benchmarking, construction worker, numerical simulation, collaboration, decision-making, integration, inspection
Subjects: data collection methods, decision analysis, modelling and simulation, practitioner, management, cognitive psychology, performance measurement, organizational analysis, quality assurance
Topics: Risk Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here