The system dynamics of engineer-to-order construction projects: Past, present, and future

Zhou, Y; Wang, X; Gosling, J and Naim, M M (2023) The system dynamics of engineer-to-order construction projects: Past, present, and future. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(5): 03123004, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

System dynamics (SD) applications in high-volume production operations are widely used, helping to define decision rules to reduce costs associated with the variance in planning orders and inventory. The exploitation of SD in engineer-to-order (ETO) project-oriented supply chains - e.g., in construction, shipbuilding, and capital goods - is less well established. Hence, this research reviews the literature that takes a systematic ETO perspective in modeling construction projects, exploiting SD approaches. To comprehensively identify and filter previously published works, we used a keyword searching method using Web of Science and Scopus databases. After applying relevant exclusion criteria, 143 papers were selected. Although previous reviews of ETO literature, more generally, have been done, this work contributes to the body of knowledge by specifically reviewing SD applications in ETO industries and providing insights by creating a categorization system by which to determine existing gaps. Articles are categorized into the classic four phases of a project: aggregated planning, preproject planning, project execution, and postdelivery. Analyses of the methods, attributes, and applications of SD were undertaken for each phase. Findings indicate that SD research covers the range of ETO industries, of which construction is the most dominant, demonstrating SD's high applicability. The wealth of case-orientated research in the construction field provides a solid foundation for further SD studies in the ETO field. Further research should focus on (1) developing a general ETO archetype for performance benchmarking and strategy development in construction projects; (2) introducing analytical tools, such as control theoretic approaches as found in manufacturing production planning and control design, to improve understanding of the ETO systems' dynamic behaviors; (3) developing cross-phase, cross-project, design-production integrated, aggregated planning models via hybrid techniques modeling, which can improve understanding of an ETO system's performance; and (4) improving model fidelity. We also provide a research agenda for each phase of the ETO production.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: literature review; modeling; project management
Index terms: research agenda, production planning, science, literature review, strategy, engineer-to-order, construction project, system dynamics, benchmarking, body of knowledge, variance, inventory, shipbuilding, database, exploitation, archetype, project management, modelling
Subjects: specialized education, computing systems, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, project delivery, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, inventory management, production management, project management theory and practice, performance measurement, management, manufacturing engineering, industry analysis, data management, research management, measurement and scaling
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Digital Applications, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here