Evaluation of data processing and artifact removal approaches used for physiological signals captured using wearable sensing devices during construction tasks

Anwer, S; Li, H; Antwi-Afari, M F; Mirza, A M; Rahman, M A; Mehmood, I; Guo, R and Wong, A Y L (2024) Evaluation of data processing and artifact removal approaches used for physiological signals captured using wearable sensing devices during construction tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(1): 03123008, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Wearable sensing devices (WSDs) have enormous promise for monitoring construction worker safety. They can track workers and send safety-related information in real time, allowing for more effective and preventative decision making. WSDs are particularly useful on construction sites since they can track workers' health, safety, and activity levels, among other metrics that could help optimize their daily tasks. WSDs may also assist workers in recognizing health-related safety risks (such as physical fatigue) and taking appropriate action to mitigate them. The data produced by these WSDs, however, is highly noisy and contaminated with artifacts that could have been introduced by the surroundings, the experimental apparatus, or the subject's physiological state. These artifacts are very strong and frequently found during field experiments. So, when there is a lot of artifacts, the signal quality drops. Recently, artifacts removal has been greatly enhanced by developments in signal processing, which has vastly enhanced the performance. Thus, the proposed review aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of the approaches currently used to analyze data and remove artifacts from physiological signals obtained via WSDs during construction-related tasks. First, this study provides an overview of the physiological signals that are likely to be recorded from construction workers to monitor their health and safety. Second, this review identifies the most prevalent artifacts that have the most detrimental effect on the utility of the signals. Third, a comprehensive review of existing artifact-removal approaches were presented. Fourth, each identified artifact detection and removal approach was analyzed for its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, in conclusion, this review provides a few suggestions for future research for improving the quality of captured physiological signals for monitoring the health and safety of construction workers using artifact removal approaches.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artifact eradication; construction health; construction safety; digital construction; noise removal; physiological signals; sensing devices
Index terms: digital construction, construction worker, real time, monitoring, fatigue, construction site, artifact, experiment, health and safety, wearable sensing device, construction safety, decision-making, data processing
Subjects: health safety and environment, computer vision, decision analysis, sociology, health conditions and diseases, project controls, information systems, environmental health, data collection methods, control systems, practitioner, work location, data science
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here